tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32307538.post1478326030237102280..comments2023-04-06T16:44:02.656-05:00Comments on Are you a good witch, or a bad witch?: Book Slutephelbahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06699743973126336389noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32307538.post-30268426764987786162008-05-07T09:22:00.000-05:002008-05-07T09:22:00.000-05:00Okay, so knowing his goal, let's assume the mongoo...Okay, so knowing his goal, let's assume the mongoose is related to it. What about a teenage boy getting laid could a not-actually-large, unnaturally gilded, squrimy and dangerous animal symbolize?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32307538.post-22100068977401877572008-05-07T08:59:00.000-05:002008-05-07T08:59:00.000-05:00To get laid. Which he did. Eventually. I can te...To get laid. Which he did. Eventually. I can tell when I read the book that it isn't a bad book- don't mean to imply it's a bad book. I think it's above me somehow and I'm left with the feeling of being inadequate. And the feeling of perplexion, because mongooses are neither golden nor large, as I understand them.ephelbahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06699743973126336389noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32307538.post-10528725590583903602008-05-06T21:15:00.000-05:002008-05-06T21:15:00.000-05:00What's the protagonist's goal?What's the protagonist's goal?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32307538.post-18520179134253327752008-04-18T19:34:00.000-05:002008-04-18T19:34:00.000-05:00Take heart! I'm reminded of Roger Ebert's rule reg...Take heart! I'm reminded of Roger Ebert's rule regarding cinema symbolism -- if you have to ask what it symbolizes, it doesn't. (Regardless of what the writer/director/artist may have intended!)J. Thorphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16240583195604796756noreply@blogger.com